Abstrakt The final study of professor Smolka in fact complements his monograph on Ladislav Vycpálek. He chronologically follows Vycpálek’s music-critical texts published between 1908 and 1920 primarily in the periodicals Hudební revue and Lumír. In the introduction he presents the context of the period – the pre-war musical society was divided in two camps roughly corresponding with the circles surrounding the periodicals Smetana and Hudební revue. Within this context he positions Vycpálek’s polemics with Nejedlý, Helfert, O. Zich and Jirák. In the pre-war period, Vycpálek’s views were strongly influenced by his teacher, V. Novák. In his texts, Vycpálek displays an affinity for the circle around Hudební revue even though he never takes part in the active „fight for Dvořák“. He states clear critical remarks concerning Foerster and Fibich, while the work of Novák and Suk is closer to his taste. Another part of the study deals with the change that Vycpálek’s evaluation takes during WW I also combined with his liberation from Novák’s influence. Nationalism becomes Vycpálek’s main evaluating criterion. He changes his attitude to folk songs as well as to Smetana in comparison to Dvořák and other Czech composers. In his critical essays after the war, he supports the rising Czech modernist composers, evaluating mainly coherence of form. He ends his publication activities in 1920 when he moves his focus primarily to composition.

Jaroslav Smolka:
Ladislav Vycpálek – the music critic
Stati a studie / Živá hudba 2011/2 / Publikováno 31. 12. 2011
Abstrakt:
The final study of professor Smolka in fact complements his monograph on Ladislav Vycpálek. He chronologically follows Vycpálek’s music-critical texts published between 1908 and 1920 primarily in the periodicals Hudební revue and Lumír. In the introduction he presents the context of the period – the pre-war musical society was divided in two camps roughly corresponding with the circles surrounding the periodicals Smetana and Hudební revue. Within this context he positions Vycpálek’s polemics with Nejedlý, Helfert, O. Zich and Jirák. In the pre-war period, Vycpálek’s views were strongly influenced by his teacher, V. Novák. In his texts, Vycpálek displays an affinity for the circle around Hudební revue even though he never takes part in the active „fight for Dvořák“. He states clear critical remarks concerning Foerster and Fibich, while the work of Novák and Suk is closer to his taste. Another part of the study deals with the change that Vycpálek’s evaluation takes during WW I also combined with his liberation from Novák’s influence. Nationalism becomes Vycpálek’s main evaluating criterion. He changes his attitude to folk songs as well as to Smetana in comparison to Dvořák and other Czech composers. In his critical essays after the war, he supports the rising Czech modernist composers, evaluating mainly coherence of form. He ends his publication activities in 1920 when he moves his focus primarily to composition.
Citace:
Jaroslav Smolka. Ladislav Vycpálek – the music critic. Živá hudba 2011/2. On-line <https://ziva-hudba.info/ladislav-vycpalek-the-music-critic/> [26. 5. 2026].
Kopírovat
Vyšlo v časopise
Živá hudba 2011/2
Rubrika: Stati a studie
Publikováno: 31. 12. 2011
PDF: download
Klíčová slova:
critical essays, historie, Hudební revue, Lumír, Smetana periodical
Články autora:
Jaroslav Smolka (23)
Aktuální čísla časopisu můžete koupit v Nakladatelství AMU.
Citace:
Jaroslav Smolka. Ladislav Vycpálek – the music critic. Živá hudba 2011/2. On-line <https://ziva-hudba.info/ladislav-vycpalek-the-music-critic/> [26. 5. 2026].
Kopírovat
Další články
-
Jaroslav Smolka:
Některé podněty deziderata z hudebněteoretického systému Karla Janečka
Stati a studie | 2003 -
Jaroslav Smolka:
Problém učebnic a antologií pro vyučování dějin hudby
Stati a studie | 2004 -
Jaroslav Smolka:
In Memoriam Karel Janeček
Mimo rubriky | 2003 -
Jaroslav Smolka:
Osobní vzpomínky na Jana Rychlíka – zejména na člověka a hudebního teoretika
Stati a studie | 2004 -
Zuzana Hradilová:
Zuzana Hradilová, Funkce baletního mistra – profese, nebo poslání?
Stati a studie | 2019/10 -
Iva Oplištilová:
Martin Iddon: New Music at Darmstadt: Nono, Stockhausen, Cage, and Boulez
Recenze | 2018/9 -
Monika Štúrová:
Cesta badatele za informacemi aneb pohled na regionální archivy v dnešní době
Stati a studie | 2020/11 -
Jaroslav Smolka:
Zrcadlová forma jako originální přínos 20. století do tradiční soustavy…
Stati a studie | 2010/1











